I don't like how the 100% 10 key chance tricks people into thinking they missed another black stone rarity thing, such as the 100mil or shadow gem items. Why are 10 treasure hunter secrets a black gem thing if the chance to get RuneScape gold is 100% in your first key for the marketing? I don't like how it's given to you personally as 100% with the start of this advertising yet it's not indicated at all from the'perspective probabilities' screen. As if anybody actually needed proof you shouldn't be trusting whatever probabilities they inform you, but hey. Bears repeating. Some individuals actually aren't conscious of that.

I think the complaint is more about the manipulative nature of this rather then the truth it is"free keys". It is a frequent strategy referred to as"the first ones free" where you give someone a free strike on something you know can be considered addictive so as to get the ball rolling in hopes they'll spend more. While the free keys are known by lots of us are a 100% fall due to previous events. There are people STILL who do not and assume they have super lucky. And people who have gambling addictions will 100% chase that winners high despite the fact that they basically won nothing.

Such a complaint tbh. They consistently provide 10thk roll, and honestly thats the best decoration to you. Why would I want gp or darts when I really could acquire a keys and keep going? Employ the"keep going" logic to somebody hooked on TH and spending IRL cash on it. Does not seem like an ethical point to me. There's a reason why more than 90% of MTX earnings comes in less than 10% of the participant base.If you remove the junkies, then the cost goes up significantly or the match shuts down. You are able to spew that"moral" shit whatever you want, but without that, you do not have a game to playwith.

If MTX is so important and sub fees are useless afterward I really don't see what's stopping Jagex from getting rid of sub prices for RS3 and let the whales cover running the game like virtually all MMOs nowadays. Mandatory subscriptions are something of the past, GW2 and ESO ditched hiding game content behind a monthly paywall to get MTX.Half the income for RS3 comes from subscriptions. Sub fees aren't useless, but MTX is also definitely assisting the game. It'd be absurd for Jagex to make the decision to just cut RS3's earnings in half (this goes for eliminating MTX or subscriptions).

I mean instead of dumping it into Chinese 22, if the game used any of that revenue that may hold some water. Wouldn't the owners be needing to maximise profit however? Cutting on subscription would half RS3's revenue. Why would the owners do this? They will attempt to increase revenue if half their earnings drops.

That is something that you ought to tell folks like EXPHuster who make it seem like subscription fees don't matter anymore telling people to shut up to buy osrs gold safe about MTX. After several years is IMO Jagex is stuck to MTX. Making them work hard for earnings to be completely earned kind MTX and expansion packs would inspire their idle management to actually do something instead of rely on monthly sure money.Out of the two of you, EXPHuster at least realises that without one half the revenue from RS3, the owners might demand more and make changes. We would see membership fees increase, if we eliminate MTX. If we eliminate subscription, then we'd see more aggressiv